David Shambaugh, “China and Europe: The Emerging Axis,” Current History, September 2004, pp.246.

　　戴炳然，“走向健康、成熟、稳定的中欧关系——中欧建交30周年感言”，《欧洲研究》，2005年第2期，第73-82页。

　　火正德，“论中欧战略关系”，《国际问题研究》，2005年第2期，第1-5，65页。

　　沈大伟， 赵晨译“新战略三角：美欧对中国崛起的反应”，《欧洲研究》，2005年第5期，第17-31页。

　　洪邮生，“欧盟与美国对话战略比较——兼论中美欧三边互动”，《现代国际关系》，2005年第8期，第1-6页。

　　Gustaaf Geeraerts, Chen Zhimin, Gkovalin Macaj, “The Reform of the UN ”, in Stanley Crossick, Etienne Reuter (eds.), China-EU:a common future, New Jersey :World Scientific,2007.

　　Liselotte Odgaard, Seen Biscop, “The EU and China: Partner in Effective Multilateralism?”, in David Kerr, Liu Fei (eds.), The International Politics of EU-China Relations, Oxford University Press,2007.

　　Charles Grant, Katinka Barusch, Can Europe and China Shape a New World Order?, Center for European Reform, 2008, pp.8.

　　Gates Gill, Melissa Murphy, (2008), “China-Europe Relations: Implications and Policy Responses for the United States”, Center for Strategic and International Studies, pp.7.

　　朱立群主编，《国际体系与中欧关系》，世界知识出版社，2008年版，第107页。 [v] Charter of the United nations, CHAPTER V, Article 24, http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/ [vi] Gustaaf Geeraerts, Chen Zhimin, Gkovalin Macaj, “The Reform of the UN ”, in Stanley Crossick, Etienne Reuter (eds.), China-EU:a common future, New Jersey :World Scientific,2007,pp.68. [vii] 倪世雄等著， 《当代西方国际关系理论》， 复旦大学出版社， 2001年版， 第378-381页。

　　Thomas G. Weiss, “The Illusion of UN Security Council Reform”, The Washington Quarterly, AUTUMN 2003, 26:4 pp. 147–161. [viii] Hill, Christopher(2006), “The European Powers in the Security Council: Differing Interests, Differing Arenas”, Laatikainen, Katie V., and Smith, Karen E. (eds), The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralism, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.53. [ix] 资中筠， 《大国保证和平的原则与大小国家平等的信念——论联合国的初始构想》， 《太平洋学报》， 1995年第2期。 [x] 参见Hans Kochler, “Organization and Global Power Politics: The Antagonism between Power and Law and the Future of World Order”, Chinese Journal of International Law (2006), Vol. 5, No.2, pp.323. [xi] Laurenti, J. (2005),”What ‘reinforce’ for the Security Council”, in Ortega, M. (eds), The European Union and the United States: Partners in Effective Multilateralism (Chaillot Paper no 78), Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, pp.70. [xii] Claude, I. (1966), “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations”, International Organization, 20/3, 367-79. [xiii] Caron, D. (1993), “The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council”, The American Journal of International Law, 87/4, 552-88. [xiv] Smadja, Daniele (2006), “The European Union and the Reform of the United States”, in Woters, Jan, Hoffmeister, Frank and Ruys, Tom (eds), The United Nations and the European Union: An Ever Stronger Partnership, the Netherland: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp.364. [xv] 以下分析主要欧盟成员国驻联合国使团在联合国发表的声明。文件来源：http://www.center forunreform.org and http://www.reformtheun.org/index.php/government_statements [xvi] Bundesregierung, “Stellungnahme der Bundersrepublik Deutschland zurr Resolution 47/62 der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen, vorgelegt am 30. Juni 1993”. Europa-Archiv 48, no. 19 (1993): D385.

　　See Roos U, Franke U and Hellmann, G. (2008), “Beyond the Deadlock: How Europe Can Contribute to UN Reform”, The International Spectator, Vol. 43, No. 1,, 43-55. [xvii] See Roos U, Franke U and Hellmann, G.(2008), “Beyond the Deadlock: How Europe Can Contribute to UN Reform”, The International Spectator, Vol. 43, No. 1, 43-55. [xviii] Dimitris Bourantonis and Konstaninos Magliveras, The Enlargement of the UN Security Council Reflections from the Current Debate, Political Studies Association, 2002 VOL 22 (1), 24-30

　　Solana Considers One EU Seat in UN Solution to Divisions, http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/reform/cluster1/2003/0324eu.htm [xix] 欧洲议会中的来自英国的议员丹尼尔-汉纳所作的关于“欧盟统一声音”的民意测验，http://www.hannan.co.uk/news.htm [xx] June 9, 2005: European Parliament Motion for a resolution on the reform of the UN (Strasbourg), http://www.europa-eu-un.org/articles/en/article_4792_en.htm [xxi] Hill, Christopher (2006), “The European Powers in the Security Council: Differing Interests, Differing Arenas”, Laatikainen, Katie V., and Smith, Karen E. (eds), The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralism, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.57.

　　Bourantonis, Dimitris and Magliveras, Konstaninos (2002), “The Enlargement of the UN Security Council Reflections from the Current Debate”, Political Studies Association, VOL 22 (1), 24-30

　　德国表明“联邦政府坚持在安理会设立欧洲席位是一个适当的职的追求的设想……但至今，欧盟成员国，除极少数例外，都支持另设常任理事国席位，而非一个欧洲席位。”German Federal Foreign Office, http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/www/en/aussenpolitik/vn/vereinte_nationen/d_im_sicherheitsrat/faq_reform/frage3_html [xxii] 该表格根据“联合国改革教育中心”网站提供的数据整理而成： “Country Positions last updated on 8 December 2008”, http://www.centerforunreform.org. [xxiii] 非洲方案要求扩大安理会至26席，菲律宾提出31席，但是美国官方一贯接受的规模在20-21席左右。 [xxiv] Laurenti, J. (2005),”What ‘reinforce’ for the Security Council”, in Ortega, M. (eds), The European Union and the United States: Partners in Effective Multilateralism (Chaillot Paper no 78), Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, pp. 76. [xxv] See Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-second Session, Report of the GA Working Group on SC Reform for 1998, 24 August 1998, Supplement No. 47 (A/52/47), annex XVI. http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/reform/scref98.htm [xxvi] See Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-fourth Session, Report of the GA Working Group on SC Reform for 2000, 25 July 2000, Supplement No. 47 (A/54/47), annex VI–X. http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/reform/oewg/wg00a6+.htm [xxvii] Farrell, Mary (2006), “EU Representation and Coordination within the United Nations”, Laatikainen, Katie V., and Smith, Karen E. (eds), The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralism, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.46 [xxviii]　张向前，　《浅析联合国安全理事会改革》，　《中山大学学报论丛》，　1999年第6期。 [xxix]　新华网，《中法联合声明》(1997年5月)，　　http://news.xinhuanet.com/ziliao/2002-09/12/content_559463.htm [xxx]　具体表述为：“为适应时代的需要，安理会应该进行必要的改革，以利加强安理会的作用，维护安理会的权威，提高安理会的效率。安理会的扩大应该遵循公平地域分配原则，首先解决发展中国家代表性不足的问题。安理会改革应该充分反映大多数会员国的意志，才经得起历史的考验。为了做到这一点，全体会员国应该进行耐心讨论，争取达成协商一致。”

 5/6   首页 上一页 3 4 5 6 下一页 尾页