4结束语
基于已有文献对制销双方一次性博弈的研究结论,本文讨论了重复性博弈模型中通过比较收益的大小来制销双方是否联盟。同时,基于利润分配因子的取值范围和制销双方重复性博弈,讨论了供应链产品安全责任协调。对于制销双方长期利益的协调,要有效地保证供应链的各节点企业诚实履行安全责任,预防供应链成员在履行安全责任时候的投机行为,就必须使得供应链各成员履行安全责任的行为有利益回报。对于制销供应链履行安全责任需要产生额外成本的协调,制造商和分销商在进行利益分配(确定的具体取值)时,一定要处理好对履行安全责任成本的补偿问题。对于因承担安全责任风险会降低企业利润的问题,可以利用利润分配因子的比例,来对应分担在下一阶段由于安全责任给供应链系统所造成的总的利润损失。
参考文献:
[1] Sethi, S.P. Dimensions of corporate social responsibility[J].California Management Review,1975, 17:58–64.
[2] Carroll, A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4: 197–505.
[3] Carroll, A.B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders[J]. Business Horizons , 1991, 34:39–48.
[4] Shrivastava, P. Ecocentric management for a risk society[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20:118–137.
[5] Jennings, M.M., Entine, J. Business with a soul: A reexamination of what counts in business ethics[J]. Journal of Public Law and Policy, 1999, 20: 1–88.
[6] Clarkson, M.B.E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20:92–117.
[7] Wokutch, R.E. Worker Protection, Japanese style: Occupational safety and health in the auto industry[J]. ILR Press, 1992, 75: 424–440.
[8] Carter, C.R, Kale, R, Grimm, C.M. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: An empirical investigation[J]. Transportation Research E, 2000, 36:219–228.
[9] Carter, C.R., Jennings, M.M. Social responsibility and supply chain relationships[J]. Transportation Research E, 2002, 38:37–52.
[10] Hsueh,C.F,Chang,M.S. Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007, 10:5–37.
[11] 罗定提,仲伟俊,梁美华. 合作定价对装配式供应链运作效益影响的分析[J]. 系统工程学报, 2002 , 1:66–70.
[12] 孟炯,唐小我,倪得兵. 消费者驱动的制销供应链联盟安全信号传递[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(5):84~89.
[13] 孟炯,唐小我,倪得兵. 制销供应链安全责任的消费者驱动研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2):52~58.
[14] 张维迎. 博弈论与信息经济学[M]. 上海:三联书店,上海人民出版社, 2001. 135–238
[15] Davis,K. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? [J]. In California Management Review,1960,(2:3):70~76.